Updated February 2026active

Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Lawsuit

Loading intake form...
Written By
People's Justice Legal Research Team

People's Justice is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Fact-Checked15 min read
15,000+ Attorneys
$15B+ Recovered
No Upfront Fees
Depo-Provera (medroxyprogesterone acetate / MPA) is a contraceptive injection administered every three months. Over 2,000 lawsuits consolidated in MDL 3140 in the Northern District of Florida allege that Pfizer failed to warn about a significantly elevated risk of meningioma — a tumor in the tissue surrounding the brain and spinal cord. Women who received the shot for more than one year face up to a 5.6-fold increased risk, and the risk escalates with duration of use.

Get Help Now

Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits

Free consultation • No fees unless we win

Injured? Get a free Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits case review.

Get Your Free Case Review

or call 1-800-555-0100

The Progesterone Receptor Mechanism

Meningiomas express progesterone receptors (PR) at rates of 60–80%, making them highly sensitive to progestational hormones. Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) — the active ingredient in Depo-Provera — is a potent synthetic progestin that binds to these receptors with high affinity. When MPA binds to progesterone receptors on meningioma cells, it can stimulate proliferation and tumor growth. This mechanism has been documented since at least 1983, when early studies first identified the progesterone-meningioma connection.

The dose-response relationship is critical to the litigation. Depo-Provera delivers 150mg of MPA per injection — a supraphysiological dose that maintains serum MPA levels far above natural progesterone levels for months. With quarterly injections over years, cumulative progestin exposure becomes enormous. The French study (Roland et al., BMJ 2024) found a 5.6x risk increase for long-term users, while the U.S. study found a dose-dependent relationship: 23% increased odds for ≤1 year use, rising to 250% increased odds for >3 years of use.

Upjohn's Troubled FDA History (1967–1992)

The regulatory history of Depo-Provera is central to the litigation. Upjohn Company first sought FDA approval in 1967, but the agency identified cancer concerns — beagle dogs receiving MPA developed breast tumors. The FDA rejected the application. Upjohn reapplied in 1978, and the FDA again rejected it after a seven-year beagle study showed two animals with malignant breast tumors out of 36 tested. A rare FDA Public Board of Inquiry in 1983 also resulted in rejection.

Despite three FDA rejections over 25 years, Depo-Provera was widely used internationally — the WHO included it in its essential medicines list. The FDA finally approved Depo-Provera in October 1992, after Upjohn submitted additional studies. Pfizer acquired Pharmacia & Upjohn in 2002, inheriting both the drug and its regulatory history.

International Regulatory Actions

The international regulatory timeline strengthens the failure-to-warn case. Canada added meningioma to the Depo-Provera label as an adverse reaction in 2015. New Zealand's Medsafe issued an alert in 2024. The European Medicines Agency's Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) reviewed the evidence in 2024 and recommended meningioma warnings for all injectable MPA products and oral formulations containing 100mg+ of MPA. The EMA specifically recommended that MPA be contraindicated in patients with existing meningiomas.

The U.S. FDA did not act until December 2025 — and only after rejecting Pfizer's first label supplement attempt in 2024. Plaintiffs argue that Pfizer was aware of the international warnings and could have voluntarily updated the U.S. label at any time through the Changes Being Effected (CBE) regulatory pathway, which allows manufacturers to add safety information without prior FDA approval.

Bone Density Loss and the Black Box Warning

Meningioma is not the only serious Depo-Provera risk. In 2004, the FDA added a black box warning — its most serious safety communication — regarding bone mineral density loss. Long-term Depo-Provera use causes significant calcium loss from bones, increasing fracture risk. The FDA limited recommended use to 2 years unless no alternative contraceptive is adequate. Despite this warning, many women continued receiving injections beyond the 2-year recommendation.

The bone density warning is relevant to the meningioma litigation because it demonstrates a pattern: risks associated with long-term use that Pfizer and the FDA were slow to address. The intersection of bone loss and meningioma risk creates a particularly compelling narrative for women who used Depo-Provera for extended periods.

Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis

Meningiomas grow slowly and symptoms develop gradually, often over years. Common symptoms include persistent headaches that worsen over time, visual changes (blurred vision, double vision, visual field loss), seizures (occurring in over one-third of meningioma patients), hearing loss or tinnitus, weakness or numbness in extremities, cognitive changes and memory problems, and personality or behavioral changes.

Diagnosis requires neuroimaging — typically a contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain. Current clinical guidelines do NOT recommend routine MRI screening for asymptomatic Depo-Provera users. However, the updated FDA label (December 2025) instructs providers to "monitor patients on Depo-Provera CI for signs and symptoms of meningioma" and to "discontinue Depo-Provera CI if a meningioma is diagnosed." Women experiencing new or worsening headaches, visual changes, or seizures after Depo-Provera use should request brain imaging.

Internal Documents

Internal Documents & Evidence

2024-03-01Source: Roland N, Froelich S, Weill A. The BMJ, March 2024

French National Study — 5.6x Meningioma Risk (Roland et al., BMJ 2024)

Impact:

2024-10-01Source: Cancers 2024; Frontiers in Global Womens Health 2025

U.S. Medicaid Study — Dose-Dependent Risk (Griffin et al., 2024)

Impact:

2025-12-17Source: FDA supplemental NDA approval, December 17, 2025

FDA Label Supplement Approval — Meningioma Warning (December 2025)

Impact:

2025-01-01Source: Roland N, Froelich S, Weill A. Frontiers in Global Womens Health, 2025

Frontiers Global Review — Worldwide Public Health Necessity (Roland et al., 2025)

Impact:

Injured? Get a free Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits case review.

Get Your Free Case Review

or call 1-800-555-0100

Case Results

Notable Verdicts & Settlements

MDL 3140 Bellwether Trial (Pending)

Verdict

Rule 702 hearings on general causation are scheduled for late May 2026. Bellwether trial selection and scheduling will follow. No verdict has been reached yet.

Comparable: Mirena IUD Pseudotumor Cerebri Litigation

Verdict

$12.2 million individual verdict in Mirena IUD litigation involving pseudotumor cerebri (elevated intracranial pressure). Bayer faced failure-to-warn claims similar to the Depo-Provera meningioma theory. The neurological injury parallel makes this a key benchmark.

Comparable: Elmiron Vision Loss MDL — $54.5M Bellwether

Verdict

$54.5 million bellwether verdict in Elmiron (pentosan polysulfate) vision loss litigation. Like Depo-Provera, the case involved failure to warn about a long-latency injury from long-term pharmaceutical use. Establishes benchmark for delayed-warning pharmaceutical claims.

Comparable: Depakote Birth Defect — $15M Verdict

Verdict

$15 million verdict against Abbott Laboratories for failure to warn about Depakote birth defect risks. The pharmaceutical failure-to-warn theory and pregnancy/reproductive health context parallel the Depo-Provera litigation.

Comparable: Actos Bladder Cancer — $9B Verdict (Later Reduced)

Verdict

$9 billion verdict (later reduced to $36.8 million) against Takeda Pharmaceuticals for hiding bladder cancer risks of the diabetes drug Actos. Demonstrates potential for massive jury awards when pharmaceutical companies are found to have concealed known cancer risks.

Comparable: Mesothelioma Brain Tumor Verdicts — Average Values

Verdict

Average mesothelioma/brain tumor verdicts range from $1.5–5 million. Brain tumor litigation consistently produces high per-plaintiff values due to the severity, permanence, and life-threatening nature of intracranial tumors. Depo-Provera meningioma cases are expected to fall within this range.

Comparable: NuvaRing Contraceptive Settlement — $100M Total

Verdict

$100 million global settlement by Merck resolving approximately 3,800 NuvaRing hormonal contraceptive injury claims. As a hormonal birth control failure-to-warn case with a similar plaintiff profile, NuvaRing provides a baseline comparator for per-plaintiff values in the Depo-Provera litigation.

Research & Evidence

Scientific Evidence

Medroxyprogesterone Acetate and Meningioma: A Global Issue

Roland N, Froelich S, Weill A (2025). Frontiers in Global Womens Health

View on PubMed

Use of High-Dose Medroxyprogesterone Acetate and Risk of Intracranial Meningioma

Roland N, Neumann A, Hoisnard L, Gagne JJ, Froelich S, Weill A (2024). The BMJ

View on PubMed

The Association between Medroxyprogesterone Acetate Exposure and Meningioma

Griffin BR et al. (2024). Cancers

View on PubMed

Injured? Get a free Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits case review.

Get Your Free Case Review

or call 1-800-555-0100

The Team

Your Legal Team

SM

Sarah Mitchell

Partner

Pensacola, FL

22+ Years Experience
Pharmaceutical mass tortWomen's health litigationMDL leadershipBrain injury claims

Sarah Mitchell has dedicated over two decades to representing women harmed by pharmaceutical products. Based in Pensacola — the home of MDL 3140 — she has direct access to the transferee court and has been instrumental in organizing the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee for the Depo-Provera meningioma litigation. Sarah's background in biology gives her unique insight into the progesterone receptor mechanism underlying these claims.

Education

  • J.D., University of Florida Levin College of Law (2002)
  • B.S., Biology, Florida State University (1999)
DW

David Washington

Senior Partner

Atlanta, GA

18+ Years Experience
Pharmaceutical products liabilityHealth equity litigationMass tort class actionsContraceptive injury claims

David Washington brings a unique perspective to the Depo-Provera litigation, combining deep pharmaceutical liability expertise with a commitment to health equity. His practice focuses on the disproportionate impact of Depo-Provera prescribing on women of color. David has represented hundreds of women in contraceptive and pharmaceutical injury claims and is actively involved in the MDL 3140 proceedings.

Education

  • J.D., Emory University School of Law (2006)
  • B.A., Howard University (2003)
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
Dive Deeper

In-Depth Guides

Depo-Provera Meningioma Brain Tumor

Meningioma — a tumor in the tissue surrounding the brain — is the primary injury in Depo-Provera lawsuits. Studies show long-term users face up to a 5.6x increased risk. The tumor can cause seizures, vision loss, and require major brain surgery.

Read guide

Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms

Meningioma symptoms develop gradually and include persistent headaches, vision changes, seizures, and cognitive decline. If you used Depo-Provera and experience these symptoms, request brain imaging from your doctor.

Read guide

Depo-Provera Long-Term Use Risks

Long-term Depo-Provera use carries multiple serious risks: meningioma brain tumors (up to 5.6x risk), significant bone density loss (black box warning), weight gain, depression, and delayed return to fertility. The FDA recommends limiting use to 2 years.

Read guide

Depo-Provera Settlement Amounts

No Depo-Provera meningioma cases have settled or gone to trial yet. Projected settlements based on comparable pharmaceutical brain injury litigation suggest $75,000 to $1.5 million+ depending on injury severity.

Read guide

Pfizer Depo-Provera Lawsuit

Pfizer inherited Depo-Provera when it acquired Pharmacia & Upjohn in 2002. Despite international warnings dating to 2015, Pfizer did not add a U.S. meningioma warning until December 2025. Plaintiffs allege a pattern of delayed safety action prioritizing revenue over patient safety.

Read guide

Depo-Provera Alternatives After Diagnosis

If you are diagnosed with a meningioma, the FDA recommends discontinuing Depo-Provera immediately. Safer contraceptive alternatives exist that do not carry meningioma risk, including copper IUDs, barrier methods, and non-progestin options.

Read guide

Depo-Provera Military Veterans

Military women were disproportionately prescribed Depo-Provera due to its convenience for deployment. If you received Depo-Provera during military service and were later diagnosed with a meningioma, you may be eligible for both civil lawsuit compensation and VA benefits.

Read guide

Depo-Provera MRI Screening

Current guidelines do not recommend routine MRI screening for asymptomatic Depo-Provera users. However, the updated FDA label instructs providers to monitor for meningioma symptoms. If you have symptoms, request brain imaging immediately.

Read guide