Filing Under a Pseudonym
The general rule in federal and state courts is that pleadings must identify parties by their true legal names. However, courts regularly grant exceptions for sexual assault plaintiffs based on the deeply personal nature of the allegations, the risk of irreparable reputational harm, the public interest in encouraging survivors to seek justice, and the absence of prejudice to the defendant (who knows the plaintiff's identity even if the public does not). Motions to proceed pseudonymously are routinely granted in both the Uber and Lyft MDLs and in state courts across the country.
Your attorney will file a motion for leave to proceed as Jane Doe (or John Doe) at the outset of your case. The motion presents the legal standard for pseudonymous filing in your jurisdiction and argues the specific facts of your situation — the sensitivity of the sexual assault allegations, your reasonable fear of public identification, and the public interest in your access to justice. Courts in sexual assault cases have been increasingly receptive to these motions in the years since #MeToo.
Protective Orders and Settlement Confidentiality
Even when full pseudonymous filing is not granted or is not sought, protective orders can limit public access to documents and testimony that identify you. Depositions of the survivor can be sealed. Medical records and psychiatric records can be produced only to attorneys under confidentiality restrictions. Settlement agreements routinely include mutual confidentiality provisions that prohibit both parties from publicly discussing the terms of the resolution.
Attorney-client privilege protects every communication between you and your attorney from disclosure. Nothing you share with your attorney in the course of the representation will be disclosed without your consent. You can speak openly and completely about your experience, your concerns, and your goals for the case — all of it is protected.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Pages
Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit
Uber faces consolidated multi-district litigation in the Northern District of California (MDL No. 3084) involving thousands of sexual assault claims from passengers. The cases allege that Uber's inadequate driver background checks, failure to remove drivers with prior complaints, and insufficient in-app safety measures enabled assaults that a more responsible platform would have prevented.
Campus Rideshare Sexual Assault
College students are among the most frequent rideshare users and face elevated risk of rideshare assault, particularly during late-night bar hours. Campus assaults may involve Title IX considerations if any university nexus exists, and minor plaintiffs have extended time to file civil claims due to SOL tolling until age 18.
SANE Exam: Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner Evidence
A sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) exam is the gold standard for documenting physical evidence of sexual assault. SANE exams are available at no cost to survivors at most hospital emergency departments and rape crisis centers, and the evidence collected can support both criminal prosecution and civil litigation — but you do not need a SANE exam to pursue a civil claim.
PTSD and Psychiatric Injury as Compensable Damages
Post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety disorders, and other psychiatric injuries caused by rideshare sexual assault are fully compensable as non-economic damages in civil litigation. Psychiatric injury is often the largest component of damages in assault cases — and it can be documented, quantified, and presented to juries through treating clinicians and forensic psychology experts.
Rideshare Assault Claims Involving Minors
When a minor is assaulted during a rideshare trip, their parent or guardian can file a civil claim on their behalf, and the statute of limitations is tolled (suspended) until the child turns 18. This means more time is available to file, but consulting an attorney as soon as possible is still important to preserve evidence and understand the child's rights.
Reporting Rideshare Sexual Assault
Reporting a rideshare assault is entirely your decision. You are not required to report to Uber, Lyft, or law enforcement to pursue a civil claim. Understanding your reporting options — and what each pathway involves — can help you make an informed decision that feels right for you.
Rideshare Assault MDL Status in 2026
As of early 2026, both the Uber and Lyft sexual assault MDLs are in active pre-trial proceedings in the Northern District of California. Discovery is ongoing, bellwether trial selections are underway, and global settlement discussions are reported to be in progress. Joining the MDL now — while proceedings are active — provides access to the benefits of consolidated discovery and positions your case favorably for any global resolution.
Lyft Sexual Assault Lawsuit
Lyft faces its own multi-district litigation for sexual assault claims, consolidated separately from Uber's MDL in the Northern District of California. Lyft's smaller market share produces proportionally comparable assault allegations, with similar claims of inadequate background checks, failure to remove dangerous drivers, and insufficient passenger safety infrastructure.
Rideshare Driver Background Checks
Uber and Lyft driver background checks use name-based database searches that miss criminal records under aliases, from states with limited reporting, and from international jurisdictions. This is structurally weaker than fingerprint-based checks required of taxi drivers, school employees, and healthcare workers in most states — and that structural gap is at the center of most rideshare assault lawsuits.
Uber Safety Report Data: What the Numbers Really Mean
Uber's 2022 U.S. Safety Report disclosed 3,824 sexual assault incidents across 2019 and 2020 — but this figure represents only assaults reported directly to Uber by passengers. With sexual assault reporting rates as low as 1 in 5, the true number of Uber assaults may be many times higher. The report was released only after years of litigation pressure and does not include Uber Eats delivery incidents.
Rideshare Assault Evidence: What Records Exist
Rideshare companies maintain extensive digital records for every completed trip including GPS route data, timestamps, driver identity, vehicle information, and complaint histories. Through litigation discovery, your attorney can compel Uber or Lyft to produce these records, which often form critical evidence in sexual assault civil cases.
Sexual Assault Statute of Limitations by State
Civil statutes of limitations for sexual assault claims have been dramatically extended in most states since 2017, with many states now providing 10-20 years or no time limit at all. If you were assaulted during a rideshare ride, even years ago, please speak with an attorney before concluding your time has passed.
Trauma-Informed Legal Process for Survivors
Pursuing a civil rideshare assault claim does not have to re-traumatize you. Attorneys who specialize in this area of law understand trauma responses, work at your pace, coordinate with your mental health providers, and advocate for procedural protections that minimize the burden on survivors throughout the legal process.
Criminal vs. Civil Cases: How They Interact
Criminal prosecution and civil litigation are entirely separate legal proceedings with different purposes, different standards of proof, and different outcomes. You can pursue a civil claim against Uber, Lyft, and the driver regardless of whether a criminal case exists, is ongoing, or resulted in acquittal. Civil claims are about compensation for your harm; criminal cases are about punishment and public accountability.
Rideshare Sexual Assault (Uber/Lyft) Lawsuit
Every ride requested through a rideshare app comes with an implicit promise of safety. When Uber and Lyft fail to fulfill that promise — through inadequate background checks, failure to remove dangerous drivers, or systemic indifference to survivor reports — the companies bear legal responsibility for the harm survivors experience. Uber's 2022 U.S. Safety Report, released only after sustained legal and public pressure, disclosed 3,824 reports of sexual assault in just two years of rides. Advocacy organizations and litigation experts believe those numbers dramatically undercount the true scope because most survivors never report to Uber or Lyft, let alone law enforcement. Both companies now face consolidated multi-district litigation (MDL) proceedings — Uber in the Northern District of California, Lyft in the same court — where thousands of individual claims have been joined for pre-trial proceedings. Civil litigation against rideshare platforms is separate from and independent of any criminal case, and survivors can pursue civil claims regardless of whether a criminal prosecution occurred or resulted in conviction. An experienced rideshare sexual assault attorney can evaluate your case confidentially, explain your rights, and pursue maximum compensation with complete discretion.
View full case overview