A strong testosterone therapy lawsuit requires documentation proving two things: (1) that you used a qualifying TRT product for a meaningful period before your injury, and (2) that you suffered a qualifying cardiovascular injury. Prescription records from your pharmacy (printable from most pharmacy portals) and hospital records from your cardiac event are the foundation of any TRT claim. The more complete and consistent these records, the stronger your case.
Additional helpful evidence includes: lab results showing elevated hematocrit or polycythemia during TRT use (supporting the biological causation mechanism); records of any physician monitoring — or failure to monitor — blood levels during therapy; and documentation of marketing materials you received about Low T. Many plaintiffs worry they have lost records — attorneys can often obtain them directly from providers, pharmacies, and insurance companies through medical release authorizations.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Pages
AbbVie's AndroGel was the #1 selling testosterone gel in the U.S. with over $1 billion in annual sales at peak. AbbVie is accused of marketing AndroGel to men with normal age-related hormone decline without adequate cardiovascular warnings. MDL 2545 in Chicago has processed over 10,000 AndroGel cases. AbbVie reportedly settled its MDL inventory for an estimated $250M–$500M (confidential). New cases are still being filed.
Learn moreAxiron (Eli Lilly) is an underarm testosterone gel marketed from 2011. Androderm (Actavis/Allergan, now Teva) is a transdermal patch. Both products are named in MDL 2545, and both defendants — unlike AbbVie — have not yet completed global settlement of their MDL inventory. Men who used Axiron or Androderm and suffered cardiovascular injuries may be in a strong position as these defendants move toward resolution.
Learn moreTestosterone therapy directly stimulates red blood cell production (erythropoiesis), raising hematocrit and blood viscosity — a known mechanism for DVT and pulmonary embolism. The FDA's 2015 black box warning specifically called out venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. DVT/PE cases that resolved without permanent injury typically settle in the $15,000–$75,000 range; PE cases requiring hospitalization or with lasting effects may settle higher.
Learn moreThe primary defendants in MDL 2545 are AbbVie (AndroGel), Eli Lilly (Axiron), Actavis/Allergan/Teva (Androderm), Pfizer (Depo-Testosterone), and Endo Pharmaceuticals (Testim, Fortesta — now in Chapter 11 bankruptcy). AbbVie's MDL docket is largely resolved via confidential settlement. Eli Lilly and Actavis/Teva remain in active litigation. Endo plaintiffs must file through bankruptcy trust.
Learn moreIn March 2015, the FDA required the strongest safety label — a black box warning — on all testosterone products for venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk, including DVT and PE. The FDA simultaneously restricted approved TRT uses to men with medical-condition hypogonadism only, excluding normal aging. The 2014 FDA Drug Safety Communication may trigger the discovery rule clock in some states. The 2015 black box warning is the most legally significant regulatory event in TRT litigation.
Learn moreStatutes of limitations for TRT lawsuits vary by state — typically 2–3 years from injury discovery. Florida reduced its SOL to 2 years effective March 2023. The 2014 FDA Drug Safety Communication may trigger the discovery rule clock in some states. Filing a Short Form Complaint in MDL 2545 provides tolling protection. Endo bankruptcy trust claims have court-set deadlines. If your cardiac event was more than 18 months ago, contact an attorney immediately.
Learn moreThe 2010 TOM Trial was stopped early due to excess cardiovascular events. A 2013 JAMA study found a 29% increased MI risk in TRT users. A 2014 PLOS ONE study found doubled MI risk in men under 65 with pre-existing heart disease within 90 days of starting TRT. The FDA acted in 2014 and 2015. Men who suffered heart attacks while on TRT may have a strong legal claim.
Learn more"Low T" — hypogonadism framed as a widespread treatable epidemic — was substantially created by pharmaceutical industry disease-awareness campaigns beginning around 2008. AbbVie spent hundreds of millions on direct-to-consumer AndroGel advertising. Eli Lilly and Actavis ran similar campaigns for Axiron and Androderm. The campaigns targeted men experiencing normal aging symptoms — fatigue, reduced libido, mild mood changes — that had never previously been treated as a medical condition requiring daily hormone therapy.
Learn moreMDL 2545 — In re: Testosterone Replacement Therapy Products Liability Litigation — is pending in the Northern District of Illinois (Chicago). AbbVie's MDL inventory is largely resolved via confidential global settlement. Eli Lilly (Axiron) and Actavis/Teva (Androderm) cases remain in active negotiation. Endo (Testim/Fortesta) claims require Endo bankruptcy trust filing. New individual cases continue to be filed in both federal and state courts.
Learn moreThe four primary qualifying injuries are: heart attack (myocardial infarction), stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE). Polycythemia that caused or contributed to a cardiovascular event may also qualify. Injury must have occurred during or within 6 months of TRT use, and you must have used a qualifying TRT product for at least 30 days.
Learn moreAbbVie reportedly settled its MDL 2545 inventory for an estimated $250M–$500M (confidential terms). Individual per-plaintiff values: DVT/PE without permanent injury ($15K–$75K), heart attack with recovery ($75K–$250K+), stroke or disability ($200K–$600K), wrongful death ($250K–$1M+). Bellwether verdicts ranged from $150K to $140M (later reduced on appeal). Remaining defendants Eli Lilly and Actavis/Teva continue negotiations.
Learn moreTestosterone Therapy Lawsuit
Men who used AndroGel, Axiron, Androderm, or other testosterone replacement products and suffered cardiovascular injuries — including heart attack, stroke, or blood clots — may qualify for compensation through MDL 2545 or individual state court litigation.
View full case overview