Statute of Limitations
California's EADACPA provides a 2-year SOL from the date the plaintiff discovers, or reasonably should have discovered, the abuse (CCP § 335.1). The discovery rule is particularly valuable in cases where the facility concealed the abuse. Wrongful death follows the 2-year SOL from date of death. California's 2023 amendment to CCP § 335.1 clarified the discovery rule for elder abuse claims.
2 years from discovery of abuse
Where to File in California
California Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act (EADACPA), Welfare & Institutions Code §§ 15600–15675, provides the most expansive elder abuse remedies in the nation. Plaintiffs who prove recklessness, oppression, fraud, or malice — not merely negligence — can recover enhanced remedies including attorney fees, costs, and pain-and-suffering damages that survive the elder's death. This "enhanced remedies" threshold is the central battleground in California nursing home litigation; facilities routinely argue their conduct was mere negligence, so documenting staffing deficiencies, ignored care plans, and repeated citations is essential to reaching the elevated standard.
The statute of limitations for elder abuse under the EADACPA is two years from the date the plaintiff discovered, or should have discovered, the injury and its cause (CCP § 335.1 applies to personal injury; W&I Code § 15657.3 governs survival and wrongful death). Wrongful death claims must be filed within two years of death. California's discovery rule tolls the SOL for cognitively impaired residents who could not have recognized the abuse, making documentation of dementia or mental incapacity at the time of injury critical to preserving late-discovered claims. Claims against a public hospital or county-owned facility require a government tort claim within six months.
Regulatory enforcement falls to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), Licensing and Certification Division, which conducts annual inspections and investigates complaints. The Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program (operated through CDSS) advocates for residents and generates complaint reports that are discoverable. The California Attorney General's Bureau of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse (BMFEA) pursues criminal and civil enforcement against facilities; referral records from BMFEA are valuable in civil litigation. Facilities must report all injuries of unknown origin and all alleged abuse to CDPH within 24 hours (H&S Code § 1418.8).
California has roughly 1,200 licensed skilled nursing facilities serving approximately 100,000 residents. The state mandates minimum staffing of 3.5 hours of direct care per resident per day (H&S Code § 1276.5), phasing to 3.2 hours by 2024 with RN requirements. Despite this, CDPH data consistently shows that understaffing — particularly on night and weekend shifts — is the leading predictor of citation deficiencies. Major chains operating in California include Ensign Group, Kindred Healthcare, and Plum Healthcare. Plaintiffs' counsel should obtain the facility's CMS Five-Star rating history, CDPH inspection reports (Form CMS-2567), and facility staffing data from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system.
Exposure in California
Source: California Department of Public Health (CDPH), 2025
Source: California Health & Human Services, 2024
Source: California Health & Safety Code § 1276.5
Clinics & Specialists in California
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center — Level I Trauma
Your Legal Team
James Nakamura
Partner, Nursing Home & Long-Term Care Practice
Los Angeles, CA
James Nakamura has dedicated his 17-year career to holding California nursing homes and assisted living facilities accountable under the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act (EADACPA), one of the nation's strongest elder protection statutes. His undergraduate background in gerontology gives him deep substantive knowledge of the aging process, common medical conditions in elderly patients, and the regulatory environment governing long-term care. James has successfully challenged arbitration clauses in nursing home admission contracts on multiple occasions, preserving his clients' right to jury trial in cases involving significant damages. He has recovered more than $95 million for clients across California, with particular expertise in cases involving large corporate nursing home chains with histories of repeat CMS deficiency citations. He is a member of the California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform (CANHR) advisory panel.
Education
- J.D., Loyola Law School, Los Angeles (2009)
- B.A., Gerontology, University of Southern California (2006)