segment

Paragard IUD Lawsuit Update 2026

Preparing your case review…
Written By
People's Justice Legal Research Team

February 2026 — First Bellwether: Teva Defense Verdict

The most significant development in Paragard litigation in 2026 was the February 5, 2026 defense verdict in Rickard v. Teva Pharmaceuticals — the first bellwether trial in MDL 2974. The jury found for Teva on all counts after a multi-week trial before Judge Leigh Martin May in Atlanta. Plaintiff Pauline Rickard alleged that her Paragard IUD broke during removal in 2018, requiring surgery, and that Teva failed to adequately warn of the fracture risk. Teva's defense argued that the labeling disclosed the breakage risk and that the provider's removal technique was a contributing factor. The verdict was immediately reported across legal news outlets and caused significant discussion among Paragard plaintiffs and their attorneys about the litigation's trajectory.

What Comes Next — March and May 2026 Bellwether Trials

Two additional bellwether trials are scheduled in 2026: one set for March 2026 and one for May 2026. These trials will present different plaintiffs with different fact patterns — likely selected to test injury profiles and damages theories that distinguish them from the Rickard case. If plaintiffs win one or both of the remaining bellwether trials, the litigation dynamic will shift significantly toward global settlement. Even if Teva wins additional bellwethers, the sheer volume of cases — nearly 4,000 — creates settlement pressure, as continued litigation is expensive for both sides. Paragard plaintiffs' attorneys are monitoring these trials closely and continuing to prepare individual cases for the most favorable resolution possible.

MDL 2974 Case Count and Key Figures

As of February 2026, approximately 3,867 cases are pending in MDL 2974 before Judge Leigh Martin May in the Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta). The MDL was formed in August 2020. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. is the primary defendant; CooperSurgical, Inc. (Cooper Companies subsidiary) is a co-defendant on distribution and marketing theories, though design defect claims against CooperSurgical were narrowed by a 2025 court ruling. The plaintiffs' steering committee coordinates discovery and expert witness strategy for all MDL plaintiffs. Local counsel in Atlanta work alongside national mass tort firms to manage the litigation's substantial logistics.

Historical Context — MDL Defense Verdicts Don't Mean Game Over

Large MDLs routinely produce defense verdicts in early bellwether trials without collapsing. The 3M Combat Arms Earplug MDL — the largest MDL in U.S. history with over 300,000 cases — saw multiple defense verdicts early in its bellwether process before ultimately achieving a $6 billion global settlement in 2023. The Bayer Essure MDL similarly produced mixed bellwether results before substantial resolution. The Rickard defense verdict will inform how plaintiffs' counsel selects and presents the next bellwether cases, strengthening the fact patterns chosen and refining the expert testimony strategy. Paragard claimants should not interpret the Rickard outcome as a signal to abandon their claims. The litigation is at a critical inflection point, and the next two bellwether results will determine the pace and magnitude of resolution.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
Related Topics

Related Pages

Paragard IUD Broken During Removal Lawsuit

Device arm fracture during removal is the central defect in Paragard litigation — when the T-frame's arms snap off inside the uterus, what was a routine office procedure becomes a surgical emergency requiring hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, or in severe cases, hysterectomy

Learn more

Paragard IUD Copper Toxicity Lawsuit

Retained copper fragments from a broken Paragard IUD can cause chronic copper exposure, inflammation, and systemic copper toxicity symptoms — an underreported injury type distinct from the mechanical fracture injuries at the center of most MDL 2974 claims

Learn more

Paragard IUD Infertility Lawsuit

Infertility caused by a broken Paragard IUD commands the highest tier of damages in MDL 2974 — projected settlements of $100,000 to $380,000 for women who lost the ability to conceive as a direct result of device fracture, surgical complications, or hysterectomy

Learn more

Paragard IUD Organ Perforation Lawsuit

Paragard fragments that migrate beyond the uterine cavity can perforate the bowel, bladder, fallopian tubes, and other abdominal organs — requiring major surgery and carrying permanent health consequences that significantly elevate damages in litigation

Learn more

Paragard IUD Removal Complications

Paragard removal complications — from arm fracture to organ migration to emergency surgery — represent a spectrum of outcomes from a device marketed as easily and safely removable, and each level of complication may support a product liability claim against Teva

Learn more

Paragard IUD Lawsuit Settlement Amounts 2026

Paragard IUD settlement amounts range from $10,000 to $380,000 depending on injury severity — with the Teva defense verdict in February 2026 creating uncertainty while two more bellwether trials in 2026 will further define the litigation's value

Learn more

Paragard IUD Statute of Limitations by State

A 2025 MDL ruling established that Paragard statutes of limitations run from the date of device breakage — not symptom onset — making immediate action critical for women whose Paragard broke in 2022, 2023, or 2024

Learn more

Teva Defense Verdict — What It Means for Paragard Cases

On February 5, 2026, Teva won the first Paragard bellwether trial — but one defense verdict in one case does not end the MDL, and women with documented infertility, surgery, and strong imaging evidence still have viable claims

Learn more

Who Qualifies for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit?

You may qualify for a Paragard IUD lawsuit if your device broke during removal and you suffered a documented injury — surgery, organ damage, or infertility — with medical records to support the claim and your state's statute of limitations still open

Learn more
Parent Case

Paragard IUD Lawsuit Lawsuit

Paragard (T380A copper IUD) was FDA-approved in 1984 and has been used by millions of American women as a hormone-free long-term contraceptive. Women and their doctors began reporting a troubling pattern: when Paragard is removed — a routine office procedure — the device's copper-and-plastic arms snap off inside the patient. The retained fragments can migrate, perforate organs, cause chronic pelvic pain, and require invasive surgery including hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, and in some cases hysterectomy to remove. Women who suffered uterine perforation, organ damage, or infertility from a broken Paragard may have a product liability claim against Teva Pharmaceuticals. The MDL is pending before Judge Leigh Martin May in the Northern District of Georgia. The first bellwether trial (Rickard v. Teva) ended in a defense verdict on February 5, 2026. Two additional bellwether trials are scheduled in March and May 2026. Settlement negotiations are active. Claimants who can document breakage, surgery, and significant injury — especially infertility — have the strongest cases.

View full case overview