segment

Who Qualifies for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit?

Preparing your case review…
Written By
People's Justice Legal Research Team

Core Eligibility Requirements for a Paragard Lawsuit

To qualify for a Paragard IUD lawsuit, claimants must generally satisfy four core requirements. First, you must have had a Paragard T380A copper IUD implanted — a hormone-free, non-medicated IUD, not a Mirena, Kyleena, Liletta, or other IUD type. Second, the device must have broken or fragmented during a removal attempt — either the provider informed you at the time, or subsequent imaging or surgery confirmed that a fragment was retained. Third, you must have suffered a documented injury from the broken device — at minimum, the need for an additional medical procedure to retrieve the fragment; ideally, a more significant injury such as uterine perforation, pelvic inflammatory disease, organ damage, or infertility. Fourth, your claim must be within the statute of limitations in your state, which runs from the date of device breakage per the 2025 MDL ruling.

Injury Severity and Case Strength

While technically any documented device fracture with a resulting medical procedure may qualify, case strength and settlement potential vary significantly by injury severity. The strongest Paragard cases involve: confirmed infertility caused by the breakage and resulting surgical complications; hysterectomy performed as a consequence of removal complications; migration of the device fragment outside the uterus requiring laparoscopy or laparotomy; and major organ damage (bowel, bladder, fallopian tubes) caused by a migrated fragment. Cases limited to a straightforward hysteroscopy with complete recovery and no lasting injury are legally viable but carry lower settlement value and may face greater scrutiny for litigation funding. An attorney can evaluate your specific injury profile and advise on case strength.

What Does Not Qualify

Paragard litigation covers injuries from device fracture during removal. Claims that do not qualify include: side effects from copper IUD use without device breakage (such as heavy periods or cramping during normal Paragard use); device expulsion — where the IUD falls out naturally — without breakage; injuries from other IUD brands (Mirena, Kyleena, Liletta, Skyla — these are hormonal IUDs not at issue in MDL 2974); and claims where the Paragard was removed completely without documented breakage. If you are unsure whether your Paragard was removed intact, review your provider's removal notes or request imaging — an attorney can help you interpret the records.

Free Case Evaluation — Know Your Options

If you are uncertain whether your situation qualifies, the fastest path to an answer is a free case evaluation with a Paragard attorney. You do not need to have all your medical records in hand — your attorney will help you gather them. You do not need to know the exact legal theory — your attorney will evaluate your facts against the MDL's current standards. What you should bring to the consultation: the approximate date of your Paragard removal procedure, any notification from your provider that the device broke, any imaging or surgical procedures you underwent after removal, and your current health status including any fertility-related diagnoses. People's Justice connects you with attorneys experienced in Paragard MDL 2974 at no cost and no obligation.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
Related Topics

Related Pages

Paragard IUD Lawsuit Update 2026

2026 is a pivotal year for Paragard MDL 2974 — the first bellwether trial ended in a Teva defense verdict on February 5, two more trials follow in March and May, and global settlement negotiations are active as both sides assess litigation risk

Learn more

Paragard IUD Broken During Removal Lawsuit

Device arm fracture during removal is the central defect in Paragard litigation — when the T-frame's arms snap off inside the uterus, what was a routine office procedure becomes a surgical emergency requiring hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, or in severe cases, hysterectomy

Learn more

Paragard IUD Copper Toxicity Lawsuit

Retained copper fragments from a broken Paragard IUD can cause chronic copper exposure, inflammation, and systemic copper toxicity symptoms — an underreported injury type distinct from the mechanical fracture injuries at the center of most MDL 2974 claims

Learn more

Paragard IUD Infertility Lawsuit

Infertility caused by a broken Paragard IUD commands the highest tier of damages in MDL 2974 — projected settlements of $100,000 to $380,000 for women who lost the ability to conceive as a direct result of device fracture, surgical complications, or hysterectomy

Learn more

Paragard IUD Organ Perforation Lawsuit

Paragard fragments that migrate beyond the uterine cavity can perforate the bowel, bladder, fallopian tubes, and other abdominal organs — requiring major surgery and carrying permanent health consequences that significantly elevate damages in litigation

Learn more

Paragard IUD Removal Complications

Paragard removal complications — from arm fracture to organ migration to emergency surgery — represent a spectrum of outcomes from a device marketed as easily and safely removable, and each level of complication may support a product liability claim against Teva

Learn more

Paragard IUD Lawsuit Settlement Amounts 2026

Paragard IUD settlement amounts range from $10,000 to $380,000 depending on injury severity — with the Teva defense verdict in February 2026 creating uncertainty while two more bellwether trials in 2026 will further define the litigation's value

Learn more

Paragard IUD Statute of Limitations by State

A 2025 MDL ruling established that Paragard statutes of limitations run from the date of device breakage — not symptom onset — making immediate action critical for women whose Paragard broke in 2022, 2023, or 2024

Learn more

Teva Defense Verdict — What It Means for Paragard Cases

On February 5, 2026, Teva won the first Paragard bellwether trial — but one defense verdict in one case does not end the MDL, and women with documented infertility, surgery, and strong imaging evidence still have viable claims

Learn more
Parent Case

Paragard IUD Lawsuit Lawsuit

Paragard (T380A copper IUD) was FDA-approved in 1984 and has been used by millions of American women as a hormone-free long-term contraceptive. Women and their doctors began reporting a troubling pattern: when Paragard is removed — a routine office procedure — the device's copper-and-plastic arms snap off inside the patient. The retained fragments can migrate, perforate organs, cause chronic pelvic pain, and require invasive surgery including hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, and in some cases hysterectomy to remove. Women who suffered uterine perforation, organ damage, or infertility from a broken Paragard may have a product liability claim against Teva Pharmaceuticals. The MDL is pending before Judge Leigh Martin May in the Northern District of Georgia. The first bellwether trial (Rickard v. Teva) ended in a defense verdict on February 5, 2026. Two additional bellwether trials are scheduled in March and May 2026. Settlement negotiations are active. Claimants who can document breakage, surgery, and significant injury — especially infertility — have the strongest cases.

View full case overview