injury

Paragard IUD Copper Toxicity Lawsuit

Preparing your case review…
Written By
People's Justice Legal Research Team

Copper Toxicity from Retained Paragard Fragments

The Paragard T380A device contains 380 square millimeters of exposed copper surface area wound around its polyethylene frame and arms. When a Paragard arm fractures and the copper-tipped plastic fragment is retained inside the uterus or surrounding tissue, the copper continues to leach ions into the surrounding tissue and bloodstream. Chronic copper exposure from retained fragments can cause local tissue inflammation, chronic pelvic pain, and in some cases systemic symptoms of copper toxicity. Copper is an essential trace mineral, but excess copper accumulation — as may occur from a retained fragment in direct tissue contact over months or years — can cause nausea, fatigue, headaches, mood disturbances, and neurological symptoms in susceptible individuals.

Copper Toxicity as a Secondary Injury in Paragard Cases

Copper toxicity claims in Paragard litigation typically arise as secondary injuries — accompanying the primary mechanical injuries of device fracture and organ perforation. Women who experienced a prolonged period between Paragard arm fracture and surgical fragment retrieval are at highest risk for significant copper exposure. Symptoms attributed to copper toxicity in Paragard litigation include chronic fatigue and cognitive changes, headaches, gastrointestinal distress (nausea, vomiting), mood disorders and anxiety, and abnormal serum copper and ceruloplasmin levels on blood testing. Laboratory documentation of elevated serum copper levels contemporaneous with the retained fragment period supports a copper toxicity claim. While copper toxicity is not the primary theory of liability in most MDL 2974 cases, it represents an additional layer of compensable damages for plaintiffs who experienced extended fragment retention.

Adding Copper Toxicity to Your Paragard Case

If you experienced symptoms consistent with copper toxicity during the period after your Paragard IUD broke and before all fragments were surgically retrieved, these symptoms should be documented and included in your legal claim. Request that your attorney order serum copper and ceruloplasmin testing if not already performed. Document all symptoms in writing with dates. Copper toxicity damages are compensable as part of your overall Paragard injury claim — they do not require a separate lawsuit but are included within your MDL 2974 case or state court action. A toxicologist or internist specializing in metal exposure can serve as an expert witness to document and quantify these damages.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
See details below.
Related Topics

Related Pages

Paragard IUD Lawsuit Update 2026

2026 is a pivotal year for Paragard MDL 2974 — the first bellwether trial ended in a Teva defense verdict on February 5, two more trials follow in March and May, and global settlement negotiations are active as both sides assess litigation risk

Learn more

Paragard IUD Broken During Removal Lawsuit

Device arm fracture during removal is the central defect in Paragard litigation — when the T-frame's arms snap off inside the uterus, what was a routine office procedure becomes a surgical emergency requiring hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, or in severe cases, hysterectomy

Learn more

Paragard IUD Infertility Lawsuit

Infertility caused by a broken Paragard IUD commands the highest tier of damages in MDL 2974 — projected settlements of $100,000 to $380,000 for women who lost the ability to conceive as a direct result of device fracture, surgical complications, or hysterectomy

Learn more

Paragard IUD Organ Perforation Lawsuit

Paragard fragments that migrate beyond the uterine cavity can perforate the bowel, bladder, fallopian tubes, and other abdominal organs — requiring major surgery and carrying permanent health consequences that significantly elevate damages in litigation

Learn more

Paragard IUD Removal Complications

Paragard removal complications — from arm fracture to organ migration to emergency surgery — represent a spectrum of outcomes from a device marketed as easily and safely removable, and each level of complication may support a product liability claim against Teva

Learn more

Paragard IUD Lawsuit Settlement Amounts 2026

Paragard IUD settlement amounts range from $10,000 to $380,000 depending on injury severity — with the Teva defense verdict in February 2026 creating uncertainty while two more bellwether trials in 2026 will further define the litigation's value

Learn more

Paragard IUD Statute of Limitations by State

A 2025 MDL ruling established that Paragard statutes of limitations run from the date of device breakage — not symptom onset — making immediate action critical for women whose Paragard broke in 2022, 2023, or 2024

Learn more

Teva Defense Verdict — What It Means for Paragard Cases

On February 5, 2026, Teva won the first Paragard bellwether trial — but one defense verdict in one case does not end the MDL, and women with documented infertility, surgery, and strong imaging evidence still have viable claims

Learn more

Who Qualifies for a Paragard IUD Lawsuit?

You may qualify for a Paragard IUD lawsuit if your device broke during removal and you suffered a documented injury — surgery, organ damage, or infertility — with medical records to support the claim and your state's statute of limitations still open

Learn more
Parent Case

Paragard IUD Lawsuit Lawsuit

Paragard (T380A copper IUD) was FDA-approved in 1984 and has been used by millions of American women as a hormone-free long-term contraceptive. Women and their doctors began reporting a troubling pattern: when Paragard is removed — a routine office procedure — the device's copper-and-plastic arms snap off inside the patient. The retained fragments can migrate, perforate organs, cause chronic pelvic pain, and require invasive surgery including hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, and in some cases hysterectomy to remove. Women who suffered uterine perforation, organ damage, or infertility from a broken Paragard may have a product liability claim against Teva Pharmaceuticals. The MDL is pending before Judge Leigh Martin May in the Northern District of Georgia. The first bellwether trial (Rickard v. Teva) ended in a defense verdict on February 5, 2026. Two additional bellwether trials are scheduled in March and May 2026. Settlement negotiations are active. Claimants who can document breakage, surgery, and significant injury — especially infertility — have the strongest cases.

View full case overview